Can radiometric dating be wrong personal property rights in canada dating

In the same way, by identifying fossils, he may have related Sedimentary Rocks B with some other rocks.

Creationists would generally agree with the above methods and use them in their geological work.

They would all have fitted nicely into the field relationships that he had observed and his interpretation of them.by Tas Walker A geologist works out the relative age of a rock by carefully studying where the rock is found in the field.The field relationships, as they are called, are of primary importance and all radiometric dates are evaluated against them.And, of course, the reported error ignores the huge uncertainties in the Creationist physicists point to several lines of evidence that decay rates have been faster in the past, and propose a pulse of accelerated decay during Creation Week, and possibly a smaller pulse during the Flood year. He may suggest that some of the chemicals in the rock had been disturbed by groundwater or weathering.What would our geologist think if the date from the lab were less than 30 million years, say 10.1 ± 1.8 million years? Or he may decide that the rock had been affected by a localized heating event—one strong enough to disturb the chemicals, but not strong enough to be visible in the field.

Search for can radiometric dating be wrong:

can radiometric dating be wrong-23can radiometric dating be wrong-82can radiometric dating be wrong-34

It is clear that the sedimentary rock was deposited and folded before the dyke was squeezed into place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “can radiometric dating be wrong”